Fareed Zakaria nabbed plagiarizing

CNN's foreign show host Fareed Zakaria was recently was nabbed plagiarizing. He made an apology however the dent had already been made. AP reported the scandal as follows:

NEW YORK (AP) — Columnist and TV host Fareed Zakaria has apologized for lifting several paragraphs by another writer for use in his column in Time magazine. His column has been suspended for a monthZakaria said in a statement Friday he made "a terrible mistake," adding, "It is a serious lapse and one that is entirely my fault."In a separate statement, Time spokesman Ali Zelenko said the magazine accepts Zakaria's apology, but would suspend his column for one month, "pending further review.""What he did violates our own standards for our columnists, which is that their work must not only be factual but original; their views must not only be their own but their words as well," Zelenko said.Media reporters had noted similarities between passages in Zakaria's column about gun control that appeared in Time's Aug. 20 issue, and paragraphs from an article by Harvard University history professor Jill Lepore published in April in The New Yorker magazine.In Zakaria's column, titled "The Case for Gun Control," he began one paragraph with the sentences: "Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA, documents the actual history in 'Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America.' Guns were regulated in the U.S. from the earliest years of the Republic."A corresponding passage in Lenore's New Yorker essay, titled "Battleground America," begins: "As Adam Winkler, a constitutional-law scholar at U.C.L.A., demonstrates in a remarkably nuanced new book, 'Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America,' firearms have been regulated in the United States from the start."In Zakaria's statement, he apologized "unreservedly" to Lepore, as well as to his editors and readers.Besides serving as an editor-at-large at Time, Zakaria is a Washington Post columnist and the host of CNN's foreign-affairs show, "GPS." Source

My take is clear.If you look at what Zakaria says and writes, sometimes, you find that he is not worth what he seems to worth so to speak. I was his fan. But as the days lapsed, I found something amiss in his clout. Rules, especially academic ones, are strict and must be obeyed mutatis-mutandis. To be referred to as an academics or a guru, one needs to know all this. If anything, playing "within the rules" is what makes an academic an academic apart from making him edgier. I would respect a person who attribute whatever he uses in his work even if it means to say he did not toil a lot. This is how we were taught at universities. I maybe wrong. Again, academics is about disciplined and following the rules religiously. Plagiarism or purloining, for an academic is like a suicide for his fame, knowledge and career. Suspending Zakaria is not enough. He should be fired. For he does not qualify to do what he was doing. They are many academic who are out there seeking to do a job best.