How the Berlin Conference Clung on Africa: What Africa Must Do
Tuesday, 31 March 2020
RIP KENNY DONALD ROGERS
August 21, 1938 – March 20, 2020
You made the world a good place to be through your talent. For us who enjoyed your music, your life added something valuable to our lives. For that reason, Kenny, Fare-thee-well. You were but an island on the stream. And that is what we are. For, nobody in between but God.
Fare-thee-Well Kenny Donald Rogers.
Africa Can Learn from Magufulification
When some dudes in Zimbabwe (New Zimbabwe, Jan., 10, 2016 cited in Mhango, 2018) coined the term Magufulification, I did not know that the term would become a buzzword. The term was coined a few months after Tanzania president John Pombe Magufuli came to power and did things in a very different manner and spirit. Magufuli’s mantra has always been Africa can and should.
Not many took Magufuli seriously. This is because many postcolonial African governments became a toto bomb minus Botswana, Mauritius and Seychelles. Practically, freedom to many African countries is endemic and systemic beggarliness, dependence and thuggery. Nations survive on begging while sitting on colossal natural resources of value. Actually, Independence in Africa was nothing but the replacement of one type of colonialism with another. External colonisers were shown the door to allow internal ones to replace them and perfect the squander of almost everything that Africans fought hard for.
While many people wrongly thought that Magufuli’s manner of doing things was a passing cloud, being a rara avis and rare breed, Magufuli has proved them wrong. Magufuli has held that Tanzania in particularly Africa in general are not supposed to beg. He has said that Tanzania is not going to beg while it sits on humongous natural resources of value. To prove his point, Magufuli has never neither toured the West nor Asia in the mission of begging. Instead, he has increased revenue collection as he embarked on the industrialization of Tanzania. As if this is not enough, Magufuli has practically taken on corruption, laziness and embezzlement of public resources. He does not spend any money on public holidays.
Africa needs able leadership that can marshal people and resources around investing in the future for self-reliance instead of begging. Magufuli has turned Tanzania into a huge and active workshop wherein mammoth projects such as the construction of Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), expansion of the Mwalimu Julius Nyerere International Airport, construction of the Stiegler’s Gorge Hydroelectrical Dam, construction of many roads and port expansion have taken place. He has moved the capital from Dar to Dodoma. These have translated into Tanzania becoming the economic powerhouse of the region. Despite facing resistance from abroad, Magufuli has stood his ground in constructing the Stiegler’s Gorge hydroelectrical dam with the aim of bringing the price of electricity in the county down to enable Tanzanians to produce more competitively and efficiently and make Tanzania a middle-income country (MIC). Even before the completion of this project, the Rural Electrical Agency (REA) has already embarked on the electrification of Tanzania under the Magufulification. According to the Xinhua (Feb., 20, 2019), the program aims at connecting 2.5 million Tanzanian households in rural areas to the national electricity grid over the next 5 years.
Magufuli has bought a couple of brand-new airplanes to revive the national carrier, the defunct Air Tanzania. Up until now, the Air Tanzania Ltd has the fleet of two 787-8 Dreamliner, two Airbus A220-300 jets and three DHC Dash 8-400 aircraft, formerly known as the Bombardier Q400 turboprop all paid cash. Magufuli still believes that Africa needs to have its own airplanes in order to attract and transport its people and tourists visiting Africa. Magufuli wants to see Air Tanzania Ltd compete with other international airlines.
To effectually and freely move goods and people, Magufuli has already revivified the Dar-Arusha railway and the central one that soon will be replaced by the SGR thereby link Tanzania with Burundi, DRC, Rwanda and Uganda after completion. He has enacted a new style of running the country based on hire and fire to see to it that public officers deliver. Leading by example, he has competently managed public finances and resources. For example, in 2017, Magufuli banned the export of mineral sands arguing that companies dealing with minerals should have smelters in the country. He put a stop on mineral smuggling by ordering the creation of local mineral trading centers in mineral-producing regions. Magufuli’s efforts have paid dividends. For, up until now, Tanzania has experienced an upwelling in revenue collection. Tanzania revenues rose by 12.7 percent in the first half of the fiscal year from the same period a year ago as collection improved (Reuters, 2017). The Tanzania Revenue Authority collected TZS 1.767 trillion in September 2019. The amount was an increase of 29.18 percent from TZS 1.335 trillion in August (africa.cgtn.com Oct., 2, 2019).
Magufulification does not lack detractors and haters who see the man behind it as a dictator. Again, if we consider how expensive democracy has been, especially for Africa, is there any way China would have made such great gains under democratic regimes? I am not trying to justify dictatorship or anything close to it. But when I consider countries such as Malaysia, Singapore and now China and the way they quickly made it out of penury, I must admit that sometimes, I concur with the man who transformed Singapore from a poor country to an opulent one. He once said that to develop a country, we need to sacrifice some rights. This is because nobody can put democracy on the table and eat it with family.
In sum, as was former US president, Barack Obama’s slogan, yes, we can, if Africa gets adept and devoted leaders like JPM, as Magufuli is famously known in Tanzania, to Magufulify Africa, it can and does not have any logical reason to become a perpetual beggar while it sits on humongous resources of value. This is the story of the Magufulification that Africa needs to study and learn from. Again, is Africa ready to learn? This is the story for another day.
Source: African Executive Magazine, 31 March, 2020.
Saturday, 28 March 2020
Kenyatta-Odinga marriage minus Ruto will change and create Kenya's national cohesion
The recent closing of ranks between President Uhuru Kenyatta and his political arch nemesis, former PM and opposition boss Raila Odinga, has deafening, dissimilar and knock-on corollaries. Their recent baby, the Build Bridges' Initiatives (BBI) seems to have thunderstruck and wowed Kenyans. As once Odinga assertively put it, the BBI is inexorable; and whoever that stands in its way will be cracked politically. This is why Deputy President William Ruto, who fervidly opposed it, had to make a U-turn and throw in the towel before the Pullman leaves him in the cold. Actually, the BBI plus handshakes have truly reconfigure and redefined Kenya’s political milieu with everlasting-domino effects. This milestone has, if anything, tremendous negative and positive effects to some wannabes, power brokers and the country in general. The Kenyatta-Odinga nuptial aka handshake whose rad baby is the BBI seems not to augur well with some other players who think have been left out for whatever reasons. For, it isn’t a secret. There are some intriguers who exploited Kenya’s long-time bog to create political niches for personal glories that are now stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea. All who sought to use Kenyatta or Odinga to prop and imbed and stamp themselves in Kenyan political landscape, under Kenyatta-Odinga acrimony, are outright losers. This is because many lacks political gravitas.
Being a political juggernaut, Odinga breastfed and sheltered many. Therefore, his impromptu move will orphan many. They’ll become first casualties. You can hear their howling and pouting with the loss almost everywhere after it bleakly dawned on them in this game that needs flexibility and scheming.
If anything, among those hard-hit is William Ruto, whom, I'd not like to refer as Doctor because of how he gained his 'PhD'. This is the man who’d love to be a Kalenjin kingmaker, if not the king, and possibly, a president of Kenya. What a toto pipe dream! Again, his strategies and style are clandestinely combative, garish and rudimentary for one reason, behaving like a bat, neither an animal nor a birdie. Despite things fall apart between him and his former partner in the Uhuruto eponym, he still plays a double role of positive and negative towards his boss. This make him look like he lacks political gravitas and stamina compared with all season politicians like Odinga. Without bribing, as now allegations surface after he dished millions wherever he goes, Ruto doesn’t impress many in anything national or political realities. He is but a newbie and provocateur that can’t disentangle with his Moi’s era youth activism that created him to end up suffering from perfidy and thievery when it comes to national cohesion and coffers. Buccaneering and precipitateness are the suitable attributes of the man thanks to his Moi nexus.
Furthermore, to be honest, Ruto’s neither toehold nor knack in his Kalenjin cosmology and politics. Look at how his namesake Isaac Ruto is damaging him. Refer to how Ruto is now taking on perceived opposing the government he pretends to serve. How does one attack his boss, the president, and still say they are on the same page? Can such a person be safe and sane politically if I may ask?
Apart from being an outsider, politically thanks to his surname, Ruto’s a neophyte in Kelenjin and Kenyans politics altogether. All know he was cloned by Daniel arap Moi. Has he forgotten his Nyayo-time ugly resume of brutality, corruption and infamy? His political resume isn’t only long-winded but is also scraggy and buoyant. He got his gravitas under Moi’s; and currently under Kenyatta's wings. This is why he’s no guts to call it a quit and be counted. Like a bat, he is neither an animal nor a birdie. He unashamedly clings to the hubby to face whatever infamy but yet undermines him. Lucky him; he’s gawkily tolerated. He must thank Kenyatta for his mercy. Otherwise, his deservedly reward is supposed to be in the cold. One’d think: Ruto would a wee bit appreciate and underscore the fact that Kenyans have brains, ears and eyes; and know how to well utilise these faculties. Rumours have it that Ruto’s amassed fetid and suspicious wealthy in a very short space of time. Can he show cause for his wealth? For a son of pauper, who survived on vending one or two chickens, I doubt. Why’s Ruto easily forgotten: many know; how he amassed ill-gotten Moola he folks out everywhere buying leverage? Former Tanzania statesman, Julius Nyerere once said: if there’s anybody voters need to fear like leprosy is none other than the one who buys others. Because he’s also bought. You can add: if one’s not bought, he robbed somebody. It becomes unbearable when a thief tries to bribe his victims with the same money one robbed them.
More on Ruto whose marriage with Kenyatta was necessitated by the International Criminal Court, his future success[es] depends on Kenyatta due to the farfetched assumption that the former helped the latter to ascend to the throne while in actuality Mwai Kibaki is the one who did the magic. He must forget to use Kenyatta once again. For, we don’t know who used whom and whom was used by who in this milieu? Has he forgotten that had it not been for Kenyatta, the ICC would have gotten him? Has he forgotten that his marriage with Uhuru was only meant to finish off ICC's looming case; and thereafter everybody to go back to where he belongs? Now that the ICC is no longer hovering over UhuRuto, what’s left of the marriage of convenience? Ruto will be making a grave mistake to believe that Kenyatta will endorse him come 2022. who knew that Kibaki who benefited from the phrase “Kibaki Tosha’ would stab Odinga in the back by refusing to replicate the same? Didn't Kibaki support Uhuru whom he beat in 2002 presidential elections? If Raila received ‘Raila Toka’ from the man he rewarded with Kibaki tosha, what’s strange for Uhuru to tell Ruto to go and politically forage as he enjoys his bromance with Raila with who they’re able to calm the nation? Has Ruto forgotten that Kenyatta and Odinga aim at creating a nation after the efforts to build the country has failed? Politics is a very dirty and dizzy game. He who thinks he’s standing must watch he mustn’t fall.
When it comes to winners, they’re Kenyatta who seeks to leave a shining legacy and Odinga whose hope for 2022 is still raw. Some make a goof assuming Odinga’s too old to run. Wrong. Ask the late Nelson Mandela (South Africa), Abdulaye Wade ( former-Senegal), Ronald Reagan (US) Jose Mujica ( former-Uruguay) late Michael Sata (Zambia), late Bingu wa Mutharika (Malawi), Muhammad Buhari (Nigeria-incumbent) Peter Mutharika (Malawi-incumbent), Hage Gottfried Geingob (Namibia-incumbent) and the late Beji Caid Essebsi (Tunisia) among others, who became presidents in their 70s. There is no retirement in politics, especially in Africa.
In a nutshell, Kenyatta-Odinga newly found love that resulted in the BBI, if isn’t felled, is likely to change Kenya’s political landscape for good. In other words, this move’s redefined Kenya’s politics by creating new environment for different forms of politics wherein victory for the state house does no longer depend on the UhuRuto calibration. One thing is recommendable. Every Kenya must support the efforts of creating and building a nation instead of a country. This is where your neighbour, Tanzania, beat you. The only way of developing a peaceful Kenya is through building a nation but not the country.
Friday, 27 March 2020
THE CLOSING OF PRESIDENT NYERERE’s THIRD LEADERSHIP TERM, (1970 – 1975).
1975 was the final year of President Nyerere’s ‘ leadership term’ which commenced in 1970. But that was to be in October, when the general elections were to be held. We will therefore discuss that event at the appropriate time later on. In the meantime, we will pick up from where we left-off last week, when we ran out of editorial space, namely, at the point where we had just listed the major decisions which had been taken in 1974, by TANU’s National Executive Committee relating to the education sector.
The Musoma NEC meeting had also placed new emphasis on the provision of Adult Education in our country. Thus, for the purpose of implementing that directive, a new Institute of Adult Education was established in 1975, which did an excellent job in its delivery; for, as a result of its magnificent performance, only two years later in 1977, Tanzania was granted “The Commonwealth Literacy Award” for having eliminated illiteracy in the country by 96%.
Other developments during that year.
Another major decision that was made by the Musoma meeting of the National Executive Committee, was the decision to make TANU, the constitutionally supreme organ of governance in this country. After that directive had been issued in 1974, the Government started prepareing the necessary amendments to the Constitution, which were eventually adopted by the National Assembly in May, 1975. Soon thereafter, President Nyerere himself issued further clarification regarding this issue, as follows: “Under our One-party Constitution, TANU is supreme. It has the mandate to give directions to the Government about the general policy which must be adopted for national development; or to give specific instructions about the priorities to be adopted, in any aspect of our national life”.
This was intended to put a close to what had come to be known as “the great supremacy debate” in the National Assembly; which had started in 1968, regarding the question ‘which of the two Institutions, the National Assembly and the TANU National Executive Committee is supreme over the other in terms of making policy’? This matter had generated some fierce debate in the National Assembly for nearly two years until 1969, when it was finally settled by the National Executive Committee in its favour; when, at its meeting in Tanga, NEC resolved to expel from party membership all those troublesome members who had been questioning the fact of TANU’s supremacy in policy making matters. Consequently, they also lost their membership of the National Assembly, simply by operation of the country’s Constitution.
“Madaraka Vijijini” legislation enacted.
The 1974 decision to grant greater decision-making powers to the Villages (by creating Village governments and Village Assemblies), was also finally implemented in 1975; when the Local Government laws were amended to make provision for these new Village governance organs to be established.
The major events of 1975.
As already stated above, the year 1975 was general election year in Tanzania, but that fact alone did not give it any additional significance. What gave that year special significance, were two historical pronouncements by President Nyerere; which he made at the time of his nomination by his party, to stand as the party’s presidential candidate in the said general elections. One was his surprise announcement, that he was accepting such nomination for the last time; as he would like thereafter to retire from Government leadership positions which he has held for a long time since independence, in order to give a chance to another person also to lead our country. We will discuss this matter at a later stage.
The other, equally unexpected, was his advise (read directive), to the two ruling parties in Tanzania, namely TANU on Mainland Tanzania, and the Afro-Shirazi Party in Zanzibar; to consider merging into “one strong, unified party, for the purpose of carrying the revolution forward”. He said thus: “Our country is governed by a one-Party Constitution. But, in fact, we are operating two separate political parties; TANU on one side of the Union; and ASP on the other side; which is clearly contrary to the requirements of the country’s Constitution”.
Work began immediately on this merger directive.
The party nomination conferences were actually joint conferences, which brought together both the TANU conference delegates, and those from the Afro-Shirazi Party. This was because the candidate to be nominated, if elected, would serve as President of the entire United Republic. For that reason Aboud Jumbe, President of Zanzibar and of the Afro- Shirazi Party, was present at the conference, leading the Afro-shirazi delegation. Thus, at the appropriate moment, as was standard practice, he rose to address the joint conference. And among his other remarks, he also made reference to President Nyerere’s proposal to merge the two parties; which, he said, he and his ASP delegation welcomed whole heartedly; and undertook to have the matter discussed by the relevant decision-making organs of the Afro-Shirazi Party, with a view to having the proposal endorsed.
Work started immediately thereafter, to have the proposal discussed by all the TANU Branches in Mainland Tanzania, as well as in all the ASP Branches in Zanzibar. Both party records show, that of the existing 6,639 TANU Branches, 6,427 did discuss this proposal, of which 6,424 (99,95%) approved it, and only 3 Branches rejected the proposal. While on the Afro-Shirazi side, which had a total of 257 Branches, all of them discussed the proposal, and gave their approval to it.
What followed thereafter.
The whole of the following year was devoted mostly to activities related to the achievement of that grand objective; which now took absolutely first priority. The Presidents of TANU and the ASP had agreed that each individual member of both parties, should be given the opportunity to express his or her views on this proposal, a kind of referendum among all the members. The necessary preparations for this ‘referendum’ were made and completed during the remaining months of 1975; which enabled the actual referendum process to commence in February 1976 and was completed by June 1976. The referendum had produced positive results, with the vast majority of the members having accepted the proposal. Thereafter, the two parties agreed to hold joint meetings of their National Executive Committees, to handle the decision-making aspects of this matter. At the first such joint meeting, which was held on 2nd October, 1976; they decided to appoint a joint 20-person Commission, 10 from either side, which was tasked to prepare the Constitution of the proposed new party.
I was fortunate to have been appointed a member of this Commission on the TANU side, and was later appointed its Executive Secretary; while mzee Thabit Kombo, Secretary- General of the ASP, was appointed its Chairman. The Commission was given one month within which to complete its assignment, which we dutifully did. But in the meantime, we were required to present progress to the Joint meeting of the two National Executive Committees, which, for that purpose, was convened twice during that short period of one month. And we were every time ready with our progress reports. And we were able to present our final Report to that body, on 5th November, 1976; at which it was decided to call a joint meeting of the congresses of the two parties, in order to adopt the proposed Constitution of the new party. The joint Congress was duly held on 21st January, 1977; which decided that the new party should come into existence on 5th February, 1977.
The other events of 1977.
The other events that occurred not long thereafter, were wholly negative to the country’s economy; for, there occurred two serious unforeseen events, which had a very negative impact on Tanzania’s economy. One was the collapse of the East African Community; and the other was the sudden sharp rise in the world oil prices.
Because of their huge impact on the Government budget, the occurrence of these two events negatively affected the implementation of the entire Government development plan; but in particular, they affected President Nyerere’s plan for shifting the government capital to Dodoma; which had to be put in abeyance for the time being.
The break-up of the East African Community actually happened on the same day that CCM was born, on 5th of February, 1977; when Kenya’s Attorney General, Charles Njonjo, suddenly announced Kenya’s withdrawal from the East African Airways, and the nationalization of that Company’s planes which were parked overnight on that day, at Nairobi, the company’s headquarters.
On receiving the strange news, President Nyerere called President Kenyatta by phone, to enquire what was happening, and why. We were later informed, that President Kenyatta pleaded ignorance of these developments, but promised to find out and let his counterpart know. But it took much longer than President Nyerere’s reasonable patience waiting for an answer, which in fact never came! President Nyerere thus decided to close Tanzania’s border with Kenya immediately. And that, effectively, was also the closure of the East African Community itself.
The negative impact of the break-up of the East African Community on Tanzania’s budget, became created by the need to establish new Government Ministries, as well as large Public Corporations, such as the Railways and Harbours; Posts and Telecommunications, the Research Organizations, and others; all of which had hitherto been funded by the East African Community.
This now brings us to the events of 1978; one of which was equally disastrous to the country’s economy. That was the sudden, unwarranted, invasion of the West Lake (now Kagera) Region, by the armed forces of President Iddi Amin Dada of Uganda; and the other was an important lesson to be learnt; which was the punishment meted out by President Nyerere to two Ministers, plus two Regional Commissioners, for offences that they themselves had not personally committed; but which had been committed by the government Security officials who were serving under their direct political responsibility and/or supervision; which is commonly known as vicarious responsibility.
The military invasion by Iddi Amin’s forces.
The people of Bukoba area in what was then the ‘West Region’ of Tanzania, woke up one morning to find themselves under fierce attack by Idd Amin’s forces from neighbouring Uganda. And later that day, Iddi Amin himself declared from Kampala, that he had “annexed that part of Tanzania and returned it to Uganda, where it rightly belongs”.
President Nyerere, who was at that time touring Songea in Ruvuma Region, returned immediately to Dar es Salaam, and called an urgent meeting of the Dar es Salaam elders at the Diamond Jubilee Hall, through whom he addressed the whole nation; to announce his declaration of war against Iddi Amin Dada. He did so in the following immortal words: “Sababu ya kumpiga tunayo; Uwezo wa kumpiga tunao; na Nia ya kumpiga tunayo. TUTAMPIGA”. The rest of the story is well-documented elsewhere.
The other grave event was the inhuman offences that had been committed by some security personnel operating in Shinyanga and Mwanza Regions; who were duly punished by President Nyerere; but who went further and, along with them, also punished two Ministers, Ally Hassan Mwinyi of Home Affairs; and Peter Siyovelwa of the Tanzania Security Services (TSS); plus the two Regional Commissioners of Shinyanga, Marco Mabawa; and Mwanza, Peter Kisumo; for vicarious responsibility.
(Will be continued next week)
piomsekwa@gmai.com /0754767576.
Source: Daily News.
Wednesday, 25 March 2020
Don't Look Down on Lockdown
Dear readers and visitors,
This blog understands the period human family is going through after screwing up almost everything the central one being environment. We feel privileged to have what it take to rethink about our lifestyles, especially the lures of over consumption which capitalism espouses for the peril of all of us or the majority of us. We insist that nobody should look down on the lockdown. As well, we think the COVID-19 pandemic provides and opportunity for us to start the dialogue on how to not only adopt, cope or become resilient but also to reassess our infrastructures and system, particularly when anything pandemic like this occurs. Instead of investing on mass weapon production, huge military budgets, we need to invest in health systems globally provided that calamities know no borders, ideology or geography.
Tuesday, 24 March 2020
Sunday, 22 March 2020
BBI must create ‘super nation’ to replace existing ‘tribal nations’
The Building Bridge Initiatives (BBI), if anything, is likely to define and redefine Kenya as the country aiming at ushering in a new and positive approach to conflict resolution shall it succeed and meet its intended goals. Truly, the whole world is watching what Kenya has recently embarked on after two arch-foes entered in a dialogue after their famous handshake 9th March 2018 after many years of the recurrence of tribal toxicity that resulted in tribal mayhem, especially after the general elections. Famous conflict resolution guru, Johan Galtung once said that “our problems are located in the past, in the present and in the future”. And indeed, our history of relationship has a lot to tell about our past, present and future. For, nobody can competently and realistically conceptualise the future without keenly looking into the past. We may ignore our past for our peril. Again, we can’t escape its ramifications. This is a natural law of things.
For Kenya as a nation that has refused to become a nation but a country, the BBI acts as the reminder that Kenya cannot run away from its past. Therefore, addressing past evils is sine qua non for Kenya to move forward competently and peacefully. Therefore, after the two protagonists underscore their roles in this impasse and thereby came out of their cocoons, Kenya has, once again, proved its resilience and broadmindedness matters of nation. However, historically, since gaining its independence, Kenya, has built the country but not the nation. This can be seen on how the communities or tribes (I hate to use this colonial coined word) have always regarded themselves as the nations. That is why it is a normal thing to hear some Kenyan politicians talking about the Maa nation, the Kamba nation, the Kalenjin nation, the Luhya nation etc. If anything, such mindset must be the first element the BBI must thwart in order to create an opportunity for the creation of the super nation called Kenya. Tribes might feel they are nations thanks to their organic formation and thinking. However, in the modern complicated and globalized world, such a rationale is what one can call logical fallacy. It doesn’t work. And if it does, it does so counterproductively. How can tribes allow the super nation to survive while it stands on their way? For the super nation to exist, tribal nations must die. The two cannot coexist in any form and way. The neighbouring Tanzania provides an ideal example. With over 120 tribes or three times of what Kenya is comprised of, it decided to butcher the tribal nation in order to allow the creation of the super nation known as the United Republic of Tanzania after the mainland Tanganyika united with the Islands of Pemba and Zanzibar in 1964. This is the history of the peaceability of Tanzania, which Tanzanians like to refer to as the Island of Peace.
As argued above, for Kenyan super nation to exist, tribal nations must be intentionally abandoned. This said, there is no way Kenya can get rid of such tribal nations without creating the system to do so. As a Tanzanian, I will use my country’s experience. To begin with, Tanzania started with the politics of nationality as opposed to the politics of tribalism. Kenyans know too well how their postcolonial government hinged on tribalism in lieu of nationalism. Although Kenya’s founders sung nationalism, they danced to tribal tune. This does not work at all. For nationalism, true nationalism to exist, everybody needs to be on board. This is precisely why I am saying that the BBI must not be politicised. If it is, many chauvinistic and Machiavellian politicians who thrive in toxic tribalism, will use tribal politics to sabotage the process of national building. One thing is unavoidably important here. Create the laws that will illegalise tribal politics by seeing to it that those who break such laws receive heavy punishments. Such laws must be enshrined in the constitution of the land in order to give them prominence. Laws alone cannot solve the problem. National dialogue, granting on campaigns must be launched to educate the citizens about the importance of having a nation but not just a country made of trivial tribal nations as Kenya has been.
Additionally, Kenyans must be educated about the importance of the unity of their country first. There is no way Kenyans can aspire to solemnize the union of East Africa while they have failed in theirs. Latin sage has it that Caritas incipit domi or charity begins at home. This is very central. For, any country in the region that aspires to join the EAC needs to have something positive to bring to the table as far as relationship is concerned. This is because birds of feathers flock together. This means that if Kenyans succeed in creating a super nation over tribal nations, it will be able to convince others that it is ready for the unification of the EA.
In a nutshell, Kenya has a very big chance of creating the super nation through the BBI shall it not be hijacked by tribal politics or being politicised to serve myopic and narrow interests of some politicians. The BBI must be made to serve all Kenyans but not some Kenyans. The super nation guarantees peace and security not only to the country but also the entire region, especially at this very moment when many parts of the world are creating regional cooperation and globalizing
Friday, 20 March 2020
Wednesday, 18 March 2020
THE MEMORABLE EVENTS OF 1971. (Continued from last week).
We have already entered a new chapter of my autobiography, which relates to my second decade in the Public Service in Tanzania. We started with the events of year 1971; when we discussed President Nyerere’s invitation to the last British Colonial administrators who were still in the service of the country when our country gained independence in December 1961; to come back and see for themselves, the amount of progress that the country had achieved ten years later, under the independence Government. This article will pick up from there. It was unfortunate that last week’s article kind of ‘jumped the queue’, by discussing the 1973 and 1974 events relating to the re-location of the Government Capital to Dodoma; and those relating to the implementation of the ‘Ujamaa Villages’ programme. This was a chronological error, which we have now corrected.
The introduction of mass militia (Mgambo) training.
After the invitations to the last Colonial administrators; the next significant event that needs to be put on record was the introduction of mass militia training for all able-bodied Tanzanians, also in 1971. This new policy was the result of the military coup, which had occurred in the neighboring Republic of Uganda, that had abruptly toppled President Milton Obote from power.
This event created such a huge negative impact on the minds of the people of Tanzania, that something had to be done quickly to reassure the population of its continued safety. In the first place, there was the shock and disbelief that such a coup had taken place in a neighboring country, Uganda. Military coups had indeed taken place before, but only in faraway countries of West Africa like Ghana and Nigeria. This was the first time it had occurred so close to Tanzania.
But secondly, and much more frightening, were the rumors that were being spread by some ‘scare-mongers’, to the effect that a similar coup was soon going to take place in Tanzania; allegedly due to “Nyerere’s unwanted Ujamaa policies”. The scare-mongers found refuge in the fact that in 1969, The General Conference of the Uganda Peoples’ Congress (UPC), Uganda’s ruling party, had adopted a new policy document titled: “The Common Man’s Charter”. This was to be their policy guide for building socialism in Uganda. It had many resemblances with our own 1967 “Arusha Declaration”. President Nyerere and I had been invited to attend that conference, which we had gladly accepted, and actually attended. Thus, the scare-mongers’ false rumours appeared credible. Something had to be done urgently, to bring the situation back to normality.
And that is when President Nyerere sprang into action, by urgently taking two rescue measures: The immediate one was to call a huge public rally at Jangwani open grounds in Dar es Salaam; in order to give the population, the necessary reassurance. He did exactly that, and at the end of a lengthy speech, in which he gave all the necessary background to the coup in Uganda, President Nyerere concluded with the following words: “I want to assure you all, that it is just not possible for a military coup to take place in Tanzania . . . It may be possible for one mad fellow out there in the street to shoot and kill me, but there can never be a military coup in Tanzania”.
His second urgent measure was to call an extraordinary meeting of TANU’s National Executive Committee, which was held in February 1971; to deliberate over the matter of the Uganda coup, and agree on any new defense strategies for our country. The result of that meeting was the production of a new policy document titled “the TANU Guidelines, 1971”; which introduced an entirely new ‘militia’ mechanism for the country’s defense, known as “Mgambo” in Kiswahili.
But beyond that, The ‘1971 TANU Guidelines’ also introduced another important, new democratic practice, that of “empowering the people to make their own decision” in matters of immediate concern to them. This was intended to concretize the concept of continuous ‘political participation by all the people’.
The major events of 1972.
(i) The decentralization of the Central Government structure.
For us Tanzanians, the year 1972 was a year of national bereavement, caused by the brutal assassination of Zanzibar President Abeid Amani Karume, who was at the same time First Vice President of the United Republic of Tanzania. That murder took place at Kisiwandui, the Headquarters of the Afro-Shirazi Party. Security investigations later revealed that this was the work of an Arab assassin, working alone, as his personal revenge for the killing of his own father during the January 1964 Revolution. Thereafter, arrangements had to be made for the appointment of a successor to that high office. After due consultations, Aboud Jumbe was selected to succeed the slain Karume.
(ii) The major reforms of the country’s Administrative structure.
Also, in 1972, President Nyerere introduced some sweeping, major reforms, which were aimed at decentralizing the administrative structure of the central Government. For that specific purpose, he had earlier contracted an American consultancy firm, Mc Kinsey Company; to undertake the necessary study, and thereafter recommend an appropriate format for the decentralization of the Government machinery ; aimed at decentralizing some of the central Government’s powers to the Regions and Districts of Tanzania Mainland. This was described in Kiswahili as “Madaraka Mikoani”. In due course, the Mc Kinsey company duly completed its assignment, and submitted its Report to President Nyerere; who, purely for the purpose of assisting him to digest that Report and its apparently ‘far reaching’ recommendations, appointed a committee of five senior Public Servants under the Chairmanship of Dickson Nkembo, the Permanent Secretary to the President, to make a careful study of that Report, and advise him accordingly. I was lucky to be one of the members of this Presidential committee. In the course of our examination of the Mc Kinsey Report, we observed that its authors had proposed turning the country’s Regions into self- governing entities, or ‘States’; each with its own Legislature, and Executive Council.
We were of the unanimous view, that such a structure would be detrimental to the unity of the country, and we accordingly recommended its rejection. President Nyerere graciously accepted our recommendation. As a result, we ended up with the ‘decentralized” system of Regional Administration that we have today, and not the ‘devolved’ system that Mc Kinsey had recommended, which is operative, for example, in Kenya.
The abolition of the Local Authorities District Councils.
The abolition of the Local Authorities’ ‘District Councils’; and of the peoples’ Cooperative Societies, were two of the major governance reforms which were also carried out in 1972; but for reasons which, ten years later, were found to be wholly unsatisfactory, thus leading to their reversal. The decision to abolish the Local Authorities’ District Councils, was an outcome of the decentralization programme discussed above. The argument then was that because of the wide disparity between the country’s different districts in terms of natural resources endowment; to rely on the local District Councils to bring equal development for all the people of Mainland Tanzania, would clearly be an unrealizable objective. Hence, it was felt that the responsibility for development should be left to the Central Government, which was in a better position to distribute the country’s wealth equitably, according to need.
But the argument regarding the abolition of the Peoples’ Cooperative Societies and Unions, was based on a totally different consideration, namely, the prevalence of large scale mismanagement; plus, even more serious, the widespread plundering and theft of public Cooperative properties. It is these differing reasons that led to the abolition of the said entities at the time they were abolished.
In this article, we will skip the events of the year 1973, which we discussed in an earlier article when we inadvertently ‘jumped the queue’.
The events of 1974.
The year 1974, actually turned out to be an extraordinary year, in terms the very significant administrative reforms that were initiated and successfully carried out during that single calendar year. The major reforms involved included:-
(i) (i) The complete implementation of the ‘Ujamaa/Development Villages’ programme, which we have already discussed;
(ii) The major reforms in the provision of Primary and Secondary education, aimed at achieving the cherished goal of ‘education for Self-Reliance;
(iii) The reforms in the procedure for student admission to the University of Dar es Salaam.
(iii) The reforms in the procedure for student admission to the University of Dar es Salaam.
All these reforms were the result of decisions arrived at by TANU’s National Executive Committee, at its meeting which was held in Musoma in April 1974. Their principal purpose was to give directives on the ways to be followed in implementing the policy of ‘Education for Self-Reliance in our educational Institutions. The following were the actual decisions which were made:-
(a) That the education which is imparted in our Primary schools should not be aimed solely at preparing students for entry into Secondary Schools, buts should, instead, be self-sufficient for the needs for the majority of the students, whose education normally terminates there.
(b) That similarly, Secondary education should not be aimed at preparing students for entry into tertiary education, but should equally be self-sufficient for the majority of the students whose education normally terminates there.
(a) That the education which is imparted in our Primary schools should not be aimed solely at preparing students for entry into Secondary Schools, buts should, instead, be self-sufficient for the needs for the majority of the students, whose education normally terminates there.
(b) That similarly, Secondary education should not be aimed at preparing students for entry into tertiary education, but should equally be self-sufficient for the majority of the students whose education normally terminates there.
(c) (c) That Primary education in Tanzania, must be universal education, or ‘education for all’; and not just for a privileged few;
(d) That in all our educational Institutions, efforts must be made to engage their relevant communities in productive activities, especially in food production, so as to enable them to become self-sufficient, at least to some measurable extent.
(e) That the format for examinations be reformed, in a way that will enable the student to be assessed both for his academic performance, and his performance in the school productive activities.
And as a follow up on its decision that primary education in Tanzania must be ‘education for all’; the NEC further directed that “within the next three years, that is to say, by the year 1977; all the preparations must have been completed, that will enable every boy and girl of school-going age, to get admission into a Primary School.
Directives regarding the provision of Technical education.
That NEC meeting further directed, that a new emphasis be placed on the provision of Technical education, by introducing a new two-year technical education programme, for all those students who completed primary education, but were unable to secure admission to Secondary education. It was further directed that each and every Secondary School should introduce the teaching of at least one technical subject of their choice, as a way of preparing those of their graduating students who would be unable to continue with higher education for self-reliance in their lives after Secondary School.
Directions relating to admissions to the University of Dares Salaam.
The said directives effectively terminated the previous system of ‘direct entry’ to the University, immediately after successful completion of Form Six at a Secondary School. The new rules required such candidates to undergo a two-year National Service training programme, during which their attitudes to work would be observed, and assessed by their commanders; and these assessments would be evaluated and taken into account by the University Admissions Board. These were, no doubt, far reaching decisions which had to be implemented.
piomsekwa@gmail.com/0754767576.
(To be continued next week).
Source: Daily News and Cde Msekwa Himself.
Sunday, 15 March 2020
Friday, 13 March 2020
PRESIDENT NYERERE’s DECISION TO RELOCATE THE GOVERNMENT CAPITAL TO DODOMA (my autobiography Continued from last week).
We concluded last week’s article with a discussion of the major restructuring of the central Government, which was the last major governance event of the year 1972. We will now move on to the events of 1973. The most significant and historical one was President Nyerere’s decision to relocate the Government administrative capital from Dar es Salam to Dodoma. It has a rather long history; but I believe that all of it is worth narrating, because of its significant lessons in relation to how democratic decisions are made.
This was a decision that was made by the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the ruling party TANU at the beginning of September, 1973; after a lengthy process of discussions, at all the different decision-making levels of that party, including what one may reasonably call a ‘referendum’, which was held at the lowest Party Branch levels. I was a participant in the making of that decision; simply because, even after my appointment as Vice Chancellor of the University of Dar es Salaam, Mwalimu Nyerere had decided that I should retain my membership of NEC as a co-opted member. Here is the full story: -
The long story actually starts in 1966, when Hon. Joseph Nyerere, (MP), and younger brother of Mwalimu Julius Nyerere; introduced a Private Members’ motion in the National Assembly, calling for the relocation of the seat of Government to Dodoma from Dar es Salaam. Being the Clerk of the Nationals Assembly myself, I was present in the House when that motion was being enthusiastically debated. But when the time came for the Government to express its views on this private member’s motion, the then Minister for Finance, Hon Paulo Bomani, strongly warned the House about the high costs that would be involved in the implementation of this huge project, which had not even included in the First Five Year Plan which was then under implementation. Hence, sensing that the Minister’s remarks would most likely result in his motion being defeated upon being put to the vote; Joseph Nyerere prudently chose to withdraw his motion, citing the military wisdom that “he who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day”.
The capital relocation project taken over by TANU.
It was probably by design that the processing of this matter was subsequently taken over by TANU. But that process started rather discreetly when, in April 1972, the Mwanza Regional TANU Working Committee (Kamati ya Utendaji ya Mkoa), quietly adopted a resolution to that effect, and made its recommendation to the Party Central Committee in Dar es Salaam, that this matter be taken up by that higher authority for further processing. And that is precisely when President Nyerere’s great interest in this project became obvious and manifest. The relevant meeting of the TANU Central Committee, under his Chairmanship, received the Mwanza regional Committee recommendation very favourably, and fast forwarded to the National Executive Committee for a decision. But the National Executive Committee apparently felt that the relocation of the Government Capital to Dodoma was such a delicate matter, that the whole party structure, including its numerous Branches, should be involved in the making of it. So be it.
The party branches were given a whole year, during which each party Branch would select its own convenient time to hold its meeting for this particular purpose. The party records show that at the end of the day, 1,859 TANU Branches participated in this exercise; of which 842 rejected the proposal, but 1,017 branches supported the proposal. TANU’s National Executive Committee met again in August, 1973, to receive these results, following which, it issued the following public statement: “The National Executive Committee has resolved that the seat of Government shall be relocated to Dodoma; and further that the move shall be completed in ten years . . . This decision is final, and the Government was directed to take immediate steps to implement this resolution”.
The following month, September 1973, the TANU bi-annual conference was due to take place. This Conference, according to the party’s Constitution, “is the supreme organ of the party, and has the mandate to alter, or amend, any resolution passed by any other organ of the party below it, or to disallow the implementation of any such resolution”. But in this case, matters were conspicuously different. In the course of his opening speech at that Conference, Chairman Nyerere said bluntly: “I would like to take this opportunity to complete an assignment that was given to me by the National Executive Committee at its recent meeting here in Dar es Salaam. Among the issues that were discussed at that meeting, was the question whether or not the Government capital should be relocated to Dodoma. The National Executive Committee made a final decision on this matter, and asked me to announce it. I will now do precisely that, and I seek the indulgence of NEC for not having done so earlier”. That was as clear as it could possibly be: the Conference was only being informed of a decision that had been finally made by the National Executive Committee.
Thereafter, President Nyerere swung into action, to implement the said decision. On 6th October 1973, by Order published in the official Gazette, President Nyerere established a new Ministerial portfolio: The Ministry of Capital Development (MCD). Furthermore, by another Government Notice (GN) no. 230, published on 12th October, 1973; the President also established a Capital Development Government Agency, ‘the Capital Development Agency’ (CDA). It was estimated that the whole project cost would amount to Tsh 3 billion, to be spent over a period ten years. And at the same time, the ruling party TANU was ordered to shift its headquarters immediately to Dodoma, in order to show a good example for the Government to emulate. So far, so good.
However, what followed thereafter, and for the next forty-three years, is a sad story; relating to huge endeavours, but which effectively became wasted efforts, which were so keenly invested by President Nyerere. and many others, into making the ‘shift-to–Dodoma’ project a success; plus the untold frustrations and disappointments which continued to torment Mwalimu Nyerere’s mind, as a result of the failure in achieving his cherished objective and dream.
There are, of course, many primary and secondary causes for this frustrating failure. They include: the cruel economic world circumstances that suddenly, and unexpectedly, occurred at the material time; such as the sudden sharp rise in the world’s oil prices ; the collapse of the East African Community; the war against the invading forces of Iddi Amin of Uganda; and, above all, the total dependence on the Government budget alone to fund all the required operations. But there was also this inevitable failure in the Government attempting to involve the private sector through what appeared to be ‘unethical inducements’. In February 1989, the Government enacted a law titled “The Dodoma Special Investment Act” (no. 7 of 1989).
This law declared the whole capital development area of Dodoma as a ‘special investment area’ and made many extremely generous provisions for the remission of a number of government taxes to all and sundry investors, who would come forward to invest in that specified area. In addition, the said law also made provision for remissions of 50% of the electricity charges; and the same for the water charges, in respect of every industry which was to be established within the specified area. But all these generous inducements failed to attract the private sector to invest in Dodoma, to the extent that had been envisaged. As the wise saying goes: “you can take a horse to a river, but you cannot force it to drink the water”.
Enter President John Pombe Magufuli.
Come July, 2016; President John Pombe Magufuli of the fifth phase Government dramatically entered the stage, by announcing his intention, and commitment, to relocate the Union Government capital to Dodoma before the end of his first term in office, that is to say, before October, 2020. And, as I write this article, the entire Government is already comfortably settled in its brand new offices, and other facilities, in what has been baptized ‘the Government City’ in Dodoma, the former Dodoma Municipality which has in the meantime also been elevated to ‘City’ status. There must be many different factors which have facilitated this extra-rapid achievement; but the following two are pretty obvious:
The first is of course the will, and determination, of President Magufuli himself. But, as we have just seen above, Mwalimu Nyerere himself had similar such will and determination, but that alone was not enough. Hence the second, and perhaps the more determinant factor, was the willing and unsolicited support of the Private sector. (which did not require any Government inducement in order to be coaxed into participation). This was evidenced by the following statement which was published in the Daily News by the Private Sector Foundation: “The Private Sector sees the Government’s intention to shift to Dodoma as a new business opportunity, because a lot of new investments will be required to meet the demands of the increasing population”. As God’s fortune would have it, President Magufuli’s promise has been fulfilled; and, consequently, Mwalimu Nyerere’s long term dream, has, at long last, come true. May his soul rest in eternal peace.
The other significant governance decisions of that period.
After the decision regarding the shift to Dodoma; the other important governance decisions that were made during that five-year leadership period of President Nyerere (1970 – 1975), include the following:- (i) The ‘Ujamaa Villages’ implementation programme; (ii) the abolition of Local Government Authorities; (iii) Major reforms in the provision of Primary and Secondary Education, aimed at achieving the goal of “Education for Self-Reliance”; and (iv) Significant reforms of the procedures for student admission to University Education. All of these reforms were carried out in 1974. Thus, this became the year of great administrative changes; or maybe some of them expensive experiments?
The ‘Ujamaa Villages’ implementation programme.
My readers will remember President Nyerere’s Parliamentary speech of 10th December 1962; in which he promised to ensure the resettlement of the rural population into properly organized Villages; and the dismal failure of that earlier experimental, capitalist oriented, ‘Village Settlements’. This matter was re-activated in 1974; when the political Branch of the ‘one-Party system of governance became unusually energetic, in its decision-making processes, and thus in its production of directives, to be implemented by the Executive Branch. The first one was the directive to implement the ‘Ujamaa Villages’ establishment programme.
My readers will remember President Nyerere’s Parliamentary speech of 10th December 1962; in which he promised to ensure the resettlement of the rural population into properly organized Villages; and the dismal failure of that earlier experimental, capitalist oriented, ‘Village Settlements’. This matter was re-activated in 1974; when the political Branch of the ‘one-Party system of governance became unusually energetic, in its decision-making processes, and thus in its production of directives, to be implemented by the Executive Branch. The first one was the directive to implement the ‘Ujamaa Villages’ establishment programme.
The entire Regional Administration was mobilized to concentrate on that single job, that was code-named “Operation Vijiji”; and was accomplished within the scheduled period. My wife Anna Abdalla had just been appointed District Commissioner for Magu District in Mwanza Region; and she has some chilling stories to tell about that particular operation; such as this one, that there was a family that requested to be allowed to decamp not during day-time like all the others, but to do so at night, under cover of darkness, because they did not want to be seen moving away with their domesticated hyena animals!).
piomsekwa@gmail.com/0754767676
To be continued next week)
Source: Daily News and Cde Msekwa.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)