That letter which was
addressed to me, in which the duo claimed
that “these unfounded allegations pose a
danger to the party’s unity, solidarity, and tranquility”, generated the emergence of a lively public debate, with some
participants seriously suggesting that “these developments bespeak of the
simmering disquiet in the ruling party, portraying a level of desperation of a
team which may be unsettled, or not fully in command”. (see THE CITIZEN of 1st July 2019, at page
4).
I have made this matter the subject of today’s article, in order to express
my own take on this; which is that the duo’s claim of that these allegations “pose
a danger to the party’s unity, solidarity, and tranquility”, is manifestly
exaggerated, or far-fetched. It is rather
like ‘making a mountain out of a molehill. With due respect, I disagree with the above
stated views.
I am of the settled
view, that there is NO such danger; as will be elaborated in my analytical comments
in the paragraphs below, which are based entirely on Mwalimu Nyerere’s
valuable teachings.
Mwalimu Nyerere’s teachings.
During his life time, Mwalimu Nyerere was a proficient
producer of learning materials. For example, in his book titled TUJISAHIHISHE, that was published in May 1962; he
focuses on what he describes as “Makosa”, meaning ‘grave
mistakes’; which must be avoided by the
leaders. It was intended to be a helpful ‘guide on
proper leadership conduct’ to the new party and Government leaders, of the
newly independent nation of Tanganyika. But
they are still as valid today as they were then.
He listed many such mistakes, but for the
purposes of this discussion, we have selected only the following few, which are the most relevant, and applicable, to the instant case.
(i) “Kosa moja kubwa,
ni kugawa watu katika makundi,
yaani kundi linaloitwa ‘letu’, na kundi linaloitwa
‘lao’. He further elaborates that
this ‘divisive strategy ‘produces antagonistic groups within the party, that
tend to undermine each other, and
thereby create serious
cracks in the party’s
solidarity and cohesion.
As
our readers will remember, this is the basic complaint which has been raised by
the duo of the retired CCM Secretaries General
against one Cyprian Musiba, namely that
his “unfounded allegations pose a danger to the party’s unity, solidarity, and
tranquility”.
(ii) “Kosa lingine, ni kuyafanya mawazo
yao (viongozi), na matakwa ya nafsi zao,
kuwa eti ni mawazo na matakwa ya raia wote”.
(iii) (paraphrased from the original, longer version): “Kosa
lingine, ni kwamba mambo yakienda mrama,
badala ya kutafuta ukweli halisi
wa chanzo cha tatizo hilo, tunatafuta
watu wa kulaumu.. Lakini yafaa zaidi
kufikia lawama kama hizo baada
ya kufanya uchunguzi wa kutafuta ukweli.
Majibu yasiyotokana na ukweli
wa chanzo cha tatizo, unaweza kutufanya tutumie dawa isiyokuwa sahihi katika
kuondoa tatizo hilo”
As can be seen, these statements (which I call teachings),
are wholly applicable to the issues which have been raised by the two retired
senior CCM officials; ndugu mzee Yusuf
Makamba, and ndugu mzee Abdulrahman Kinana; as will presently be shown.
My own analysis of the impact of the Makamba/
Kinana complaints.
There are two principal issues that I am addressing here. The
first
is the contention by the duo,
that Cyprian Musiba’s “ unfounded
allegations (against them) pose a danger to the party’s unity, solidarity, and
tranquility”; and the other is the duo’s
appeal to the BARAZA la Viongozi Wakuu
Wastaafu wa CCM, to intervene in their favour, “as best we can”.
With regard to the first issue, I respectfully dispute the
duo’s submission quoted above. This disagreement is premised on two considerations:
(a) That this apparent
conflict is only a minor “ war between brothers” (in the sense that both parties owe their
allegiance to CCM). It cannot
possibly lead to such disastrous results as are envisaged in the duo’s
contention. As the well-known Kiswahili
adage goes, “Ndugu wawili wakipigana,
shika jembe ukalime”. CCM definitely has the capability to
resolve this minor conflict.
(b) That, even if the duo’s contention that
Musiba’s allegations result in “posing a danger to the party’s unity and
solidarity” turns out to be true, it
cannot cause much serious damage to the party, as it will be given a quick ‘nib
in the bud’, to prevent any serious harm being caused to
the party.
The
long history of our party shows that we have been faced with this problem (of emerging antagonistic groups within our party) more
than once before; but the good news is that we have always been able to overcome such
problems successfully, and peacefully. This demonstrates clearly that CCM’s
has the capacity to ‘drop its oxygen masks’ whenever there is a shortage of oxygen supply,
and that
“when the going gets tough, the tough get going” .
This
reminds me of the very serious troubles that
faced CCM during the Fourth phase
Government of President Kikwete, which was haunted by a series of damaging scandals that eventually ignited massive ‘people’s collective anger’ against the party ; and led to a serious
reduction of CCM’s victory in the next following
Presidential elections which were held in 2010
down to 61.17%, from an unprecedented high of 80,25% obtained in 2005.
It all started with the “Richmond scandal” which, literally, “ split the CCM members of
Parliament right down the middle”, into the “Mafisadi” group on one side,
and the “ anti-Mafisadi” group on the other; a situation which eventually led to the forced resignation of Prime
Minister Edward Lowassa in February 2008.
This ‘Richmond scandal’ was followed, in quick succession, by other, and
even more damaging scandals consisting of accusations directed at some leading
CCM personalities, relating to money which, allegedly, had been stolen from the
External Payment Account (EPA) of the Bank of Tanzania. Such serious
accusations, plus the apparent
lack of willingness on the part of the
Government to take action against the named persons; naturally generated wide-spread dissatisfaction and anger among many Tanzanians, and hugely
contributed to the loss of confidence in the ruling party, which was accused of
“deliberately protecting their mafisadi
cadres within its ranks”!
An objective comparison of those events with what is contained
in the Makamba / Kinana letter, will reveal that the duo’s perceived
‘ danger of damaging the party’s unity, solidarity and
tranquility” is, in reality, actually non-existent, and misconceived; apart from being grossly exaggerated. The need to establish the
truth of the matter.
In his TUJISAHIHISHE treatise,
Mwalimu Nyerere says thus: “yafaa zaidi tufikie maamuzi yetu baada ya kufanya uchunguzi wa kutafuta kweli. Ili kutufanya tusitumie
dawa ambayo siyo sahihi kwa kuondoa
tatizo lililopo.”
This statement also applies to the Makamba /
Kinana issue. Such serious allegations
as were made by Cyprian Musiba, would certainly
constituted a serious act of provocation
to any innocent person. This is what underscores the need
for making a thorough
investigation, so as to determine the truth of this matter; and in particular, to determine the (hidden) motives of the
players concerned on both sides
of this conflict; in order to
establish whether there is any attempt
“to protect some personal interests, by presenting them as those of the all the people”!
For example, the duo has blamed CCM “for keeping quiet and
taking no action” regarding this matter. However, in fact, the victims
themselves had, initially, also kept quiet about it.
It has been said that “there are two sides to
every coin”. It is thus quite possible,
that the CCM authorities thought that if these allegations were mere fabrications,
the victims concerned would have taken appropriate steps to challenge them publicly; which, unfortunately, did not happen. Thus, because of the
well-known theory that “silence means consent”; it would surely be unreasonable
to blame CCM authorities for ‘keeping quiet’,
since the complainants themselves had similarly kept quiet about
it.
But in any case, it
seems most unlikely that the alleged ‘failure by CCM to take action” alone can,
in reality, create the requisite amount of ‘intensive public anger’ against the
ruling party, to the extent of causing a split into warring groups within CCM. Our resilient party will no doubt be
able to devise effective internal strategies to deal with this problem, as it
has successfully done in the past.
Furthermore, Mwalimu Nyerere also said thus in his treatise:
“Kosa lingine ni (kwa viongozi) kuyafanya mawazo yao, na matakwa ya nafsi zao,
kuwa eti ni mawazo ya raia wote.” Thus, In view of these disturbing revelations; the party may need
to investigate Cyprian Musiba’s motives,
as well as the complainants’ motives, in order to determine the truth regarding
the possibility of any one side, or perhaps both sides, attempting to protect
their own personal
interests, by (falsely)
presenting them as ‘the interests of the party’.
My response to the
Makamba / Kinana petition.
With regard to the second issue (of the duo’s appeal to our BARAZA
to give a ‘sympathetic’ hearing to
their urgent appeal to intervene, ‘as best we can)’; I promptly delivered my written responses to the
duo. And
because their letter to me was made available to the media, I considered it
appropriate that I should do likewise, and availed my replies to the same media
outlets.
Essentially, what I
did in my replies was simply to draw their attention to those provisions of the
party Constitution which effectively constrain our BARAZA from acting on
their request, and in the manner that they themselves suggested, namely that
“Wazee watumie busara zao kulishughulika jambo hili”.
“Busara” is, of course, God’s precious gift to human beings, which is
commonly believed to accumulate in line with a person’s age. It is for that reason that all the Wazee persons are
culturally and traditionally given high respect, and generally honoured,
for their ‘accumulated wisdom’.
However, ‘Baraza la Viongozi Wakuu wastaafu wa
CCM’, is a constitutional organ, formally established by the CCM Constitution, and
given specific jurisdiction. In that
connection, I drew their attention to the fact that this BARAZA has no jurisdiction whatsoever,
neither ‘original jurisdiction’ to hear
such complaints, which is the sole responsibility of the other organs of the party; nor ‘appellate jurisdiction’ to determine an appeal against the party, which they
accuse of having “failed to take action”.
Thus, attempting to undertake a duty that the party
Constitution has not expressly allocated to it, would clearly constitute a blatant
breach of that Constitution, an unlawful act
which the former highly respected, top national Government leaders,
cannot possibly entertain.
Consequently, dangled
“busara za wazee” can neither lawfully be relied on, nor accepted, as a reasonable defense for such breach. Hence, as the Biblical parable says: “the
soul may be willing, but the body is weak”.
Since every person is constitutionally entitled to his
opinion, other people will, understandably, have a totally different view. No problem with that. It also reminds me of god old Shakespeare’s saying
in Hamlet, III. 1: “Be thou as chaste
as ice, as pure as
snow, thou shall not escape calumny”.
piomsekwa@gmail.com /
0754767576.
Source: Daily News and Cde Msekwa himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment