The Chant of Savant

Wednesday 11 November 2020

TOWARDS PRESIDENT MAGUFULI’s SECOND TERM : “MAGUFULIFICATION” CONTINUED , or ALUTA CONTINUA.

                                                                                                                                                                                                     

        The  2020  general  election  was  truly  historic,  not  only  in  terms  of   CCM ‘s  sweeping   overall  victory,   but    it  was   also   historic  and   admirable   in  terms  of  the   flawless,  and  near - perfect   way,   in  which  the  entire  exercise  was  administered   by  the  National  Electoral  Commission. I  have  myself  witnessed,    and  actually   participated,  in  each  one  of  the   general  elections  that  have  been  held   since  1965 (the  first  general  election  to be held   after  the  country’s  independence),  and  I  can  bear  true   testimony  to  the  fact  that  the  2020  general  election  was,  by  far,   the  best  organized  of  them  all.                                
 The  “Magufulification”  concept“Magufulification”   is  the  name  that  was   ‘invented’  by  certain  dedicated  academicians   during  President  Magufuli’s  first  term  in  office,  in  order  to  describe  his  unprecedented,  unique,  refreshing    style  of  governance.   They  justified   their  initiative   in  the  following  words:-  “President  Magufuli’s   style  of  leadership  needs  to  be  given  a  conceptual  dress,  so  that  it  can  be  well  studied  and  analysed,  in  order  to  enable  others  to  benefit  from  it”.   They   certainly   deserve   to   be   highly  commended  for  this  not  only  relevant,  but  also   most  appropriate,   linguistic  invention.                                                But  as  a   result  of  the  October  28th  general  election,  which  has  wiped  the  “official  Opposition ”  team  completely   out  of  Parliament,   this   has  added  a  totally   new  meaning  to  that   term.    For,     “Magufulification”   can   now   also   be   correctly   described  as  “the  art  of  lawfully   changing  a  country’s  political  landscape,  through  the  ballot  box”. President   Magufuli  is  still   in  his  first  week  since   he  took  office.  What   should   we   expect  from  him  during  his  second  and final  term? What  we  should  expect.
         Judging  from  President   Magufuli’s    huge  and   unprecedented   election  victory;    it  would  be   a  fair  intellectual  exercise   to  ‘speculate’   on  what   is  to  be  expected  from  him  during  his  second  and  final  term.    In  my  humble  opinion,  it  will    be   a  more  vigorous  continuation  of  his “Magufulification”    surprises;    or  ‘Aluta  continua’.                                                                                                Thus,  in  pursuance  of  that  objective,  and   as  a  gentle   reminder  to  the  general  public,  in  today’s  article,  we  will   focus   mainly   on  some  of  the  most  attractive  leadership  features  that  we  witnessed   during  his  first  term,  that  appear  to  have  led  to  the  said   academicians’   invention  of  the  term  “MAGUFULIFICATION”;   and,   specifically, on   the  unique,  twin  aspects  of  his  remarkable   ‘appetite’   for  the  virtues   of  “assiduity”  and  “innovation” ,  in  his  equally   unique  leadership   style.                                      
        But  before  that,   we  will  briefly  refer  to  a  ridiculous   claims  being  advanced  by   some  of  the  dissatisfied  Opposition  political  parties,    which  lost  the  election,   namely   that  “their  votes  were  stolen”.     Votes   being    stolen?     No    way !                                                   
        But  such  ridiculous  claims   were  also   made  immediately    after  the  2015  Presidential  election,      advanced   by  the  “best loser”  political  party  CHADEMA.   This   was   not  only  a   ridiculously   false      claim,  but  was  also  dangerous  for  country’s  the  peace  and  political  tranquility;  and  must  therefore    be  strongly  disputed,   whenever  it  happens.   
        Disputing   the   false   claims   of   “votes  having  been  stolen”.
 Our  ‘best  loser’  political  parties  in  the  past  Presidential  elections,   namely   Chama  cha  Demokrasia  na  Maendeleo  (CHADEMA),  and  the    Civic  United  Front  (CUF)  have  always   ‘invented’   a  rather  strange explanation  for  their  failures;    which  was    to   claim   very  loudly,   that  their  votes  “had  been    stolen” !   We  heard  that  from    CHADEMA’s  Presidential  candidate  Edward  Lowassa  when  he  lost  in  the  2015  Presidential  election,  which he  had  confidently  assured  himself  that  he  was  going  to  win   “even  before  the  second  (Sunday)  Holy Mass   was   over”.    When   he  actually  lost   that  election,   he  immediately   claimed  loudly,   that   his  votes   “had  been  stolen”.                                                          
        On  its  part,   the  Civic  United  Front  has  been  making  the  same,  or  similar  claims,  in  rejecting  the  Zanzibar  Presidential  elections,   ever  since  the  re-introduction  of  multi-party  elections   in  1995 ( all  of  which  they   lost.    In  my  article  published  in  this  column  on  April  13th,  2017, I  presented   a  critical  rejoinder  to  such  claims,  basing  my  argument    on  Sir  Winston  Churchill ‘s   ‘political  wisdom’.  
        Sir  Winston  Churchill   on  the   art  of   politics.
That   British  Statesman  and  war-time  British  Prime  Minister,  Sir  Winston  Churchill,  is  on  record  as  having  said  the  following:-  “Politics”  is  the  ability  to  foretell  what  will  happen  tomorrow,  or  next  week,  or  next  year;    plus  the  ability  to  find  an  explanation  for   why  it  did  not  happen”.  
Such   false   claims  by  any  losing  party,   are  simply    rendered   ridiculous   by  the  obvious  fact  of   the  transparency  of  the  relevant  exercise.    This   transparency    is  provided  for  in  our  electoral  laws  and  procedures,  which   make  adequate  provision  for  the  prevention  of  any  such  fraud.     
        For  example,   there  are  provisions  in  those  laws,  which  allow  each  political  party  to  appoint  its   own  “polling  Agents”,  whose  functions  are clearly  specified  therein,  namely      “ to  represent  and  safeguarding  the  interests  of  the  party’s  candidate  at  the  polling  station”.  The  words  “safeguarding  the  party’s  interests”   obviously  include  the  responsibility  to  ensure  that  the  votes  of  that  party’s  candidate  are  not  stolen.                                                                                                    Furthermore,  the  election  laws  also  provide  for  the  appointment   of  a  “counting  agent”    by  every   candidate,  to  represent  him  during the  counting  and  addition  of  votes  by  the  Returning  Officer,  or  by  the  Electoral  Commission,  as  the  case  may  be.                                                                              
        In  the  light  of  these  legal  provisions,  plus  the  fact  that  candidates  have  always   appointed  their  polling  and  counting  agents  as  required  by    law;    how  can  anyone  manage  to  “steal  votes”  in  the  presence  of  all  these  watchful  representatives  of  the  candidates  themselves ? Thus,   my   strong  message  here   is  that,   should  any  of   the  “best  losers”  in  this  year’s    Presidential   election   be  tempted  to   claim  that  their  votes  “have  been  stolen”;     the  enlightened  public  should   understand  that  this  is  merely  the  implementation  of   Sir  Winston  Churchill ‘s  ‘political  wisdom’  quoted  above;    and,  therefore,   any   such   misguided   claims  should   just   be  ignored.                                               
          Having   thus   disabused  that  false  notion  of  ‘votes  being  stolen’;   we  can  now  move  on  to  today’s   chosen  topic  for  discussion,  namely,  what  is  to  be  expected  from  President   Magufuli’s  second  term.      
A  continuation  of   the  “Magufulification”  syndrome.  
During  his first  term  as  President  of  the  United  Republic  of  Tanzania,  John  Magufuli  has  clearly  demonstrated   his  unique  personal  leadership  style,  which  was  characterized   by  the  twin  factors  of   ‘assiduity’,  and  ‘innovation’. The   word   “assiduity”   describes   a  person’s   habit  of  working  very  hard,  and  making  sure  that  everything  is  done  as  well  as  it  can  be.   This  is  what  adequately  explains  his  invention  of  the  slogan  “HAPA  KAZI  TU”.            
        While,  in  the   context  of  this  article,  the  word   “appetite”   refers   not  to  the  usual  physical  desire  for  food,  but  to  a  peculiarly  strong  desire  for  ‘something’.  And  in  President  Magufuli’s  case,  that  ‘something’  is   INNOVATION;   which  means  the  introduction  of   new  things,   ideas,  or  ways  of  doing  things.                                                                                                               
        I   carefully   recorded   some   of   his  first  term  performance. 
Soon   after  President  Magufuli  had   assumed  office,   and   in  the  course  of  my  diligent  search  for  suitable  materials   to  be  published  in  this  column,   I  hit  upon  the   idea  of  putting  on  record  some  of   President  Magufuli’s   performance,  and     ‘miracle’  achievements;    through  articles    published   in  this  column  regularly,   at  the  end  of  every  year.    These  articles  are  what  present   some  solid  evidence  of  President  Magufuli’s     twin  qualities  of  ‘assiduity’   and  ‘innovation.             
         The  first  of  such  articles  was  published  at  the  end  of  his  first  year  in  office,   on  22nd  November,  2016;   in  which,   in  relation  to   the  President’s   qualities  of  ‘assiduity’  and  ‘innovation’,   I   did  put  on  record,  among  other  things,  his   unprecedented   action   of  cancelling   the  pompous   and  costly  display  of  huge   military  parades  that  have  always  marked  our  independence  day  celebrations   on  9th  December;   and,  instead,  he  ordered  that  independence  day  be  celebrated  by   way  of  everyone  undertaking  the  more  important  task  of  cleaning  their  surrounding   environment,  wherever   they  live.     
        The  following  year’s  article  was  published    on  November  2nd,  2017,  when  President  Magufuli    had   just  completed  his  second  year  in  office;   in  which  I  narrated  his  other   demonstrated  qualities   as  “a  man  of  action”,  as  well   as  “a  man  of  his  word” ,  who  walks  his  talk.  For,   he  had  brought  ‘real  and  substantive  change’  during  his  two  years  in  office,  both  on  the  Government  side,  where  he  had  introduced  new  tax  collection  initiatives,  resulting  in  the  amounts   of  money  collected  through  taxes,  suddenly  rising  from  the  previous  billions  to  the  current  trillions  of  shillings.                                                       
        And   similarly on  the  party  side,  in  his  capacity  as  national  Chairman  of  the  Ruling  party  CCM;  where, within  only  six  months  after  his  election  as  national  CCM  Chairman,  he  had  introduced  certain  “sweeping,  tsunami-type  reforms”  in  the  party’s  organizational  structure,  which   replaced  the  previous  outdated  party  structure  which  had  become  totally  unsuitable.    
         Another  article    was    published  on  1st  November,  2018  after  he  had  completed  his  third  year  in  office.    In  that  article  I  made  a  brief  review  of  President  Magufuli’s  performance  in  the  crucial  social  and  economic  sectors,  including  his  effective  tax  collection  drive,  which  had  enabled  him  to  undertake  some  mega  infrastructure  development  projects  and  substantial  poverty  alleviation  measures ;   effective  delivery  of  goods  and  services  to  the  people  by  providing  greatly  increased  facilities  for education,  health,  water  and  sanitation  services;    his  successful   industrialization  drive;  as  well  his introduction  of  ‘sanity’  in  the  public  service.       
        I  further  described  President  Magufuli’s   qualities,    as    a  ‘doer  of  things’;   a  ‘man  of  action’;  an  ‘innovator’;  and   submitted   that  “in  my  considered  opinion,   during  the  three  relatively  short  years   that    President  Magufuli  has  been  in  office,    he  has  clearly  demonstrated  that  he  is,  indeed,    in  possession  of  all  these  qualities”  and  listed  a   selection  of  his  initial  promises,  and   their  subsequent  implementation”,   as  evidence.
         The  final  such  article  was  published   on  14th  November,  2019;   under  the  title  “Magufuli’s    four  legendary  successful  years”,  which  was  a  quotation  from  an  advertisement  that had  appeared  prominently  on  the  front  page  of  the  Daily  News  for  several  days  leading  to  the  5th  day  of  November,  2019,  the  fourth  anniversary  of   John  Magufuli’s   shining   Presidency.      
The   invited   stakeholders    did   respond   positively   to  that  invitation.
What   they  said.
        As    expected,  many  different  people  did  express  their  varied  opinions  in  assessing  President  Magufuli’s  performance  at  that   stage.  That  is  when   a number  of  innovative  academicians,  the  likes  of   Kenyan  Professor  Patrick  Lumumba  and  others,   proposed   that  “President  Magufuli’s  style  of  leadership   needs  to  be  given  a  conceptual  dress,  so  that  it  can  be  well  studied  and  analyzed,  in  order  to  enable  others  to  benefit  from  it”;  and  consequently  ‘invented’   this   new  concept,   which  they  baptized  in  the  captivating   name  of  ‘MAGUFULIFICATION”.      
        And  now  that,  as  a  result  of  his  sweeping   victory  in  the  2020  Presidential  election,    President  Magufuli   will be  “armed  to  the  teeth”  with   the  massive  peoples’   confidence  that  was   expressed   by    the  super  high  percentage  of  votes   cast  in his  favour  on  28th  October,  2020;   plus  a  Parliament  which  is  ‘full  to  the  brim’  with  loyal  CCM  members,   who  will  be  ready  and  willing  to  support  all  his  proposals;    and  also  considering  his  election  campaign  promises,   that   he  will  deliver  more  surprises   if  he  is  re-elected;     we  can  confidently  expect  a  vigorous   continuation   of    his  “miracle  performance”  during  his  second   term. In  other  words,  it  will  be  “Magufulification”    continued,   and    at  a  much  higher  level. piomsekwa@gmail.com   /   0754767576.
Source: Daily News and Cde Msekwa himself.

11 comments:

A. Massawe said...


What the respected author shared on the past and future of Magufulification, including on the outcome of the 2020 General Election that almost completely wiped off the Official Opposition in Parliament is very interesting.

However, the main of what would made it progressive is the critical aspect of it that would addressed where and how unexploited opportunities could have been exploited for the past and future of Magufulification to become more progressive, including through the sharing and serious consideration of all constructive alternative views of it from the Ruling CCM or the Ruling CCM and the Official Opposition especially through the Parliament.

For example, exploitation of such opportunities would made the development priorities Magufulification was and would be on a lot more progressive especially through the maximization of the participation of Tanzanians and Tanzanian firms rather than foreigners and foreign firms in the development of the mega projects financed by the Government through tax and borrowed revenues, and in the development and exploitation of national mineral prospects.

Ndugu Nkwazi N Mhango said...

Thanks for the comment. Hopefully Cde Msekwa will see it and respond. You are always welcome to read, comment and advise brother Antipas.

A. Massawe said...


Thank for replying.

In fact it is the main of what a liquidation of the Official Opposition for a CCM’s dominated Parliament that endorses directives of the President and/or the Government without questioning and/or enhancing them adequately could end up making the Magufulification treatment we are on a failed attempt unnecessarily.

Constructive critical review of our development endeavors has always been the main of what makes them most progressive.

Ndugu Nkwazi N Mhango said...

Let us face it. Was the opposition offering constructive and critical alternative? If Nyerere was able to develop a country under one party, if the CCM plays its cards wisely, nothing is amiss. Similarly, there was no way the ruling party would help its opponents to grow where they refused to do so. Methinks, I might be wrong, the CCM has answered to the problems the hoi polloi was facing for many years.

LGFumbuka said...

In my opinion there is one factor that has not been discussed enough: the mafiga matatu scenario. More in the nature of public education and voter sensitisation, it begins from understanding of the fact that a functioning government needs to have all the pillars of state singing from the same script. You must weigh the overall objective of development versus your personal likes and dislike. Sugu won Mbeya on tribal grounds (Wanyakyusa are a small minority in the city and uanaharakati, not on issues. Even the lower levels of society, so-called, like the machinga, or the activist groups, like students, or the unemplyed youth, are normally attracted to the opposition. When Magufuli gave them the ID cards, it was like heaven on earth to them. When he increased the HELSB loans, it woke up the students. They could now see why the MP must “connect” with the President, and that without that link, their “saviour” ould go. Hence the mafiga matatu: tundulissu was really stupit in accusng Magufuli of being a thief on the machinga IDs - none of his advisors except maybe Lema or Sugu saw that this accusation was actually pouring fuel on Magufuli burning popularity. The machinga cards, the HELSB loans, the rural hospitals, the REA program: al these connected with mafiga matatu. The rest is history. Msigwa, Halima, Esta1, Esta2, Henche, Lema, etc were all like one-legged bandits.

Ndugu Nkwazi N Mhango said...

LGFumbuka I can't agree with you more. In fact, Magufuli being a son of farmer knew where to put his priorities. He played a localized game while the opposition kept the same script that many failure kept to end up replicating the same. For the person who was travelling from Bukoba via Kampala and Nairobi, to be able to crisscross Tanzania with hours is something nobody can challenge. The lady who was delivering outside of the hospital or whose kids were unable to go to school or enjoy umeme wa rea would be crazy to abandon a person who thwarted such problems within five years in office. For the person who could not get a job simply because jobs were taken by forgers, to see them being crucified and thereby get a job based on merit would not vote for story makers. To be frank, opposition, currently, has nothing to do or offer in the country.
If you analyse and enumerate factors that helped Magufuli to easily win and decimate opposition the list goes on and on.

A. Massawe said...


Dear Nkwazi,

Me think the performance of Magufulification would have been much higher if deployment of the operating environment conducive for the Official Opposition stakeholders to be able to support it more and more constructively especially through more and more constructive critical reviews of its priorities and methodologies in the Parliament is also what it did.

However, me also think a going back from the multiparty to a mono party democracy that relies on internal rather than external critical reviews of its priorities and methodologies especially through the Parliament would deliver a lot more progressively especially in our country that is underdeveloped democracy of many tribes.

And, yes you are wrong here because you haven’t shown anywhere and/or how Magufulification could review its priorities and methodologies to maximize its performances in the multiparty democracy operating environment.

Ndugu Nkwazi N Mhango said...

Dear Antipas,
I am so sorry about returning here a wee bit late. I know; you know. We have a difference of nine hours between us. let me go to the argument and offer my quid pro quo thereof. The issue that revolves around opposition supporting or opposing Magufulification is immaterial. Can you underline this that it is not the role of the ruling party to manufacture opposition. If it decided to do so, we will have bogus one such as the one once existed in the DRC under that monkey Joseph Desire Mobutu. Such an opposition is much easier to manufacture than to wipe out the serious one. Our opposition leaders must start looking at issues they can address critically and entice the hoi polloi instead of copying from the west.
Having a single party for me is viable. That is because western democracy is always more expensive so as to force us depending on the west to fund our elections. We need a type of democracy that is home grown instead of languishing on the umwelt of the west for our peril. Look at what is now ongoing in the USA. Isn't that the failure of western democrazy? Imagine. If what is ongoing were in Africa, you would hear them shouting at top of their lungs wanting us to follow the rules of democracy that they have now failed to uphold despite being their creature.
When it comes to Magufulification reviewing its priorities and methodologies, you are the one who is wrong. Do you think that the achievements it recorded were because of critical opposition and advice? If you remember, they were the ones who were complaining that Magufulification is setting money aside without following procedures. They are the ones who were jeering at him when he decided to purchase the planes not to mention some calling him a thug during the campaigns of the just ended elections.
In a nutshell, if Tanzanians need opposition or not will support it or keep on voting out. That's my hunch-cum-take.

A. Massawe said...


Dear Nkwazi,

The only important and progressive opinions I expected to hear from this article are on the unexploited opportunities (including the existence, and the absence of the Official Opposition in Parliament) Magufulification could exploited, and exploit where and how to maximize its achievements during the existence, and the absence of the Official Opposition in Parliament.

Moreover, such opinions should be very well founded on the roles the existence of the Official Opposition in Parliament is so heavily paid for from taxpayer monies to serve the nation especially through the Parliament.

That‘s all I wished the respected author of it would bother to clarify for here.

Ndugu Nkwazi N Mhango said...

Dear Antipas,
I fully concur with you. provided I am not the author of the above piece, I must hang my boots here. Importantly, touched base with Cde Msekwa on the matter though I am not quite sure he'll be able to respond timely. I appreciate your insights even if we don't agree with each other. A few people do spend time to contribute their nuggets of wisdom, which is bad. My belief is that intellectuals and academics need to duplicate what they acquired behind the walls known as schools. Your visit to this blog has been more productive. I wish people would emulate you to offer their expertises and air their views. Thanks once again and welcome once again.

A. Massawe said...


Dear Nkwazi,

Thanks again for your very kindly response to the clarification I shred above highlighting the importance to base all R&D other developmental endeavors of mankind including all reviewing of national issue by all in the Parliament for example on the Law of Negation of the Negation….Google for what it means here:

Negation of the Negation, Law of the | Article about Negation ...


Negation of the Negation, Law of the | Article about Negation ...