The Building Bridge Initiatives (BBI), if anything, is likely to define and redefine Kenya as the country aiming at ushering in a new and positive approach to conflict resolution shall it succeed and meet its intended goals. Truly, the whole world’s watching what Kenya’s recently embarked on after two arch-foes entered in a dialogue after their famous handshake 9th March, 2018, after many years of the recurrences of tribal toxicity that resulted in tribal bedlam, especially after the general elections. Famous conflict resolution guru, Johan Galtung once says that “our problems are located in the past, in the present and in the future.” And indeed, our history of relationship’s a lot to tell on our past, present and future. For, nobody can competently and realistically conceptualise the future without keenly looking into the past. We may ignore our past for our peril. Again, we can’t escape its ramifications. This is a natural law of things.
For Kenya, as a nation that’s refused to become a nation but a country, the BBI acts as the reminder that Kenya cannot run away from its past. Therefore, addressing past evils is sine qua non for Kenya to move forward competently and peacefully. Therefore, after the two protagonists underscore their roles in this impasse; and thereby came out of their cocoons, Kenya’s, once again, proved its resilience and broadmindedness matters of nation. However, historically, since gaining its independence, Kenya’s built the country but not the nation. This can be seen on how the communities or tribes (I hate to use this colonial coined word) have always regarded themselves as the nations. That’s why it is a normal thing to hear some Kenyan politicians academics and elites talking about the Maa nation, the Kamba nation, the Kalenjin nation, the Luhya nation etc. If anything, such a mindset must be the first element the BBI must thwart in order to create an opportunity for the creation of the super nation called Kenya. Tribes might feel they’re nations thanks to their organic formation and thinking. However, in the modern complicated and globalized world that more needs unity than anything, such a rationale’s what I call logical fallacy. It doesn’t work. And if it does, it does so counterproductively. How can tribes allow the super nation to survive while it stands on their way? For the super nation to exist, tribal nations must die. The two can't coexist harmoniously in any form and way. The neighbouring Tanzania provides an ideal example. With over 120 tribes or three times of what Kenya is comprised of, it decided to butcher the tribal nation in order to allow the creation of the super nation known as the United Republic of Tanzania after the mainland Tanganyika united with the Islands of Pemba and Zanzibar in 1964. This is the history of the peaceability of Tanzania, which Tanzanians like to refer to as the Island of Peace.
As argued above, for Kenyan super nation to exist, tribal nations must be intentionally abandoned. This said, there’s no way Kenya can get rid of such tribal nations without creating the system to do so. As a Tanzanian, I’ll use my country’s experience. To begin with, Tanzania started with the politics of nationality as opposed to the politics of tribalism. Kenyans know too well how their postcolonial government hinged on tribalism in lieu of nationalism. Although Kenya’s founders sung nationalism, they danced to tribal tune. This doesn’t work at all. For nationalism, true nationalism to exist, everybody needs to be on board. That’s precisely why I’m saying that the BBI must not be politicised. If it is, many chauvinistic and Machiavellian politicians–––who thrive in toxic tribalism–––will use tribal politics to sabotage the process of national building. One thing’s unavoidably important here. Create the laws that’ll illegalise tribal politics by seeing to it that those who break such laws receive heavy punishments. And if this is done, you’ll rise up to the occasion for your prosperity and security as a people and a nation. Such laws must be enshrined in the constitution of the land in order to give them prominence. Laws alone cannot solve the problem though. National dialogue, granting on campaigns must be launched to educate the citizens about the importance of having a nation but not just a country made of trivial tribal nations as Kenya’s been.
Additionally, Kenyans must be educated about the importance of the unity of their country first through civic education and strenuous campaigns so that they can make a very sound decision on the matter. There’s no way Kenyans can aspire to solemnize the union of East Africa while they have failed in theirs. Latin sage’s it that Caritas incipit domi or charity begins at home. This is very central. For, any country in the region that aspires to join the EAC needs to have something positive to bring to the table as far as relationship is concerned. This is because birds of feathers flock together. This means that if Kenyans succeed in creating a super nation over tribal nations, it will be able to convince others that it is ready for the unification of the EA.
In a nutshell, Kenya’s a very big chance of creating the super nation through the BBI shall it not be hijacked by tribal politics or being politicised to serve myopic and narrow interests of some politicians. The BBI must be made to serve all Kenyans but not some Kenyans. The super nation guarantees peace and security not only to the country but also the entire region, especially at this very moment when many parts of the world are creating regional collaborations and globalizing.
For Kenya, as a nation that’s refused to become a nation but a country, the BBI acts as the reminder that Kenya cannot run away from its past. Therefore, addressing past evils is sine qua non for Kenya to move forward competently and peacefully. Therefore, after the two protagonists underscore their roles in this impasse; and thereby came out of their cocoons, Kenya’s, once again, proved its resilience and broadmindedness matters of nation. However, historically, since gaining its independence, Kenya’s built the country but not the nation. This can be seen on how the communities or tribes (I hate to use this colonial coined word) have always regarded themselves as the nations. That’s why it is a normal thing to hear some Kenyan politicians academics and elites talking about the Maa nation, the Kamba nation, the Kalenjin nation, the Luhya nation etc. If anything, such a mindset must be the first element the BBI must thwart in order to create an opportunity for the creation of the super nation called Kenya. Tribes might feel they’re nations thanks to their organic formation and thinking. However, in the modern complicated and globalized world that more needs unity than anything, such a rationale’s what I call logical fallacy. It doesn’t work. And if it does, it does so counterproductively. How can tribes allow the super nation to survive while it stands on their way? For the super nation to exist, tribal nations must die. The two can't coexist harmoniously in any form and way. The neighbouring Tanzania provides an ideal example. With over 120 tribes or three times of what Kenya is comprised of, it decided to butcher the tribal nation in order to allow the creation of the super nation known as the United Republic of Tanzania after the mainland Tanganyika united with the Islands of Pemba and Zanzibar in 1964. This is the history of the peaceability of Tanzania, which Tanzanians like to refer to as the Island of Peace.
As argued above, for Kenyan super nation to exist, tribal nations must be intentionally abandoned. This said, there’s no way Kenya can get rid of such tribal nations without creating the system to do so. As a Tanzanian, I’ll use my country’s experience. To begin with, Tanzania started with the politics of nationality as opposed to the politics of tribalism. Kenyans know too well how their postcolonial government hinged on tribalism in lieu of nationalism. Although Kenya’s founders sung nationalism, they danced to tribal tune. This doesn’t work at all. For nationalism, true nationalism to exist, everybody needs to be on board. That’s precisely why I’m saying that the BBI must not be politicised. If it is, many chauvinistic and Machiavellian politicians–––who thrive in toxic tribalism–––will use tribal politics to sabotage the process of national building. One thing’s unavoidably important here. Create the laws that’ll illegalise tribal politics by seeing to it that those who break such laws receive heavy punishments. And if this is done, you’ll rise up to the occasion for your prosperity and security as a people and a nation. Such laws must be enshrined in the constitution of the land in order to give them prominence. Laws alone cannot solve the problem though. National dialogue, granting on campaigns must be launched to educate the citizens about the importance of having a nation but not just a country made of trivial tribal nations as Kenya’s been.
Additionally, Kenyans must be educated about the importance of the unity of their country first through civic education and strenuous campaigns so that they can make a very sound decision on the matter. There’s no way Kenyans can aspire to solemnize the union of East Africa while they have failed in theirs. Latin sage’s it that Caritas incipit domi or charity begins at home. This is very central. For, any country in the region that aspires to join the EAC needs to have something positive to bring to the table as far as relationship is concerned. This is because birds of feathers flock together. This means that if Kenyans succeed in creating a super nation over tribal nations, it will be able to convince others that it is ready for the unification of the EA.
In a nutshell, Kenya’s a very big chance of creating the super nation through the BBI shall it not be hijacked by tribal politics or being politicised to serve myopic and narrow interests of some politicians. The BBI must be made to serve all Kenyans but not some Kenyans. The super nation guarantees peace and security not only to the country but also the entire region, especially at this very moment when many parts of the world are creating regional collaborations and globalizing.
Source: African Executive Magazine today.
No comments:
Post a Comment